Project Description
ENERGY PERFORMANCE CONTRACT MODELS |
|||
CONTRAC TYPE | CHAUFFAGE | ||
SCHEME OF THE CONTRACT |
|
||
GENERAL INFORMATION | CUSTOMER | ─ The customer entrusts the management of its plants to the ESCO and it pays a fee equal to the historical spending or lowerAt the end of the contract, the customer has the ownership of the property | |
ESCO |
─ ESCO pays the energetic bills and bills of fuel for the duration for the contract (technical risk) ─ ESCO finances the maintenance/ redevelopment / upgrading interventions of the existing installations ─ For the duration of the contract, receives 100% of the savings achieved |
||
BANK | ─ The Bank finances the ESCO if not use the equity | ||
SWOT ANALYSIS | STRENGTHS | ─ Suitable for renovation and management of energy systems in buildings that require specific standards of comfort (eg hospitals, schools, government offices where the respect of a certain comfort has priority over the level of energy savings) | |
WEAKNESSES |
─ Energy savings lower than other models ─ Long time for the contract |
||
OPPORTUNITY |
─ The flexibility of this model is advantageous because it allows for the ESCO easier to find private partners ─ The ESCO will have the opportunity to choose whether and to what extent perform the renovations |
||
THREATS | ─ Intervention on infrastructure is not always guaranteed, unless otherwise agreed in the contract | ||
LEARN MORE | http://iet.jrc.ec.europa.eu/energyefficiency/european-energy-service-companies/energy-performance-contracting |